Skip to content

Elevation Analytics

The Privileges page (Windows → Privileges) gives you a continuous audit trail of elevation activity across your fleet. Use it to understand how often users request elevated access, which applications are being elevated, and whether those requests are being approved or rejected — all without touching individual endpoints.

All views share a single time range selector at the top: Today, 3D (3 days), 7D, 1M, and 3M. The elevation count badge next to the selector shows the total number of elevation events in the selected period at a glance.

Changing the time range updates every chart simultaneously, so you can quickly compare a single day against the past month.

The Summary tab is the starting point — it answers the question “how much elevation activity is happening?”

Four count cards show the totals for the selected period:

  • Installed Applications — software installed through a privilege elevation
  • Removed Applications — software removed through a privilege elevation
  • Elevated Applications — the number of distinct applications that were elevated
  • Elevated User Accounts — the number of distinct users who requested elevation

If these numbers are unexpectedly high, or growing over time, that is a signal to review whether your elevation policies are scoped correctly.

The Applications tab shows install and remove events that happened via elevation. It is useful for answering “what software is being installed or removed by users who needed elevated rights?”

If you see unexpected applications being installed through elevation, check whether those applications should be deployed centrally through Application Manager instead of relying on individual user elevation requests.

Process elevation is the more granular of the two elevation types — a user runs a single executable with admin rights rather than gaining a full admin session. This tab answers “which applications are being elevated, by whom, and are those requests being allowed?”

The Elevated Applications chart shows which executables are elevated most frequently. High counts for unexpected applications may indicate users working around policy restrictions.

The Elevated User Accounts chart breaks down elevation requests per user into Approved and Rejected. A user with many rejected elevations is repeatedly trying to run something that policy does not allow — that is worth investigating. A user with consistently approved elevations for the same application is a candidate for a dedicated process elevation rule so they do not need to request it manually each time.

Session elevation gives a user temporary administrator rights for their entire session, not just a single process. It is broader and less restrictive than process elevation.

The Elevated User Accounts chart here shows the same Approved/Rejected breakdown, but scoped to session elevation requests. Because session elevation is more powerful, rejected session elevation requests deserve closer attention than rejected process elevation requests.

  • Process vs. Session elevation — Process elevation is scoped to a single executable and is the preferred approach for most use cases. Session elevation is broader and should be granted only where process elevation is not practical. Both types are configured under Windows → Configurations → Privileges.
  • Rejected elevations are not failures — they are the policy working correctly. But a pattern of repeated rejections for the same user or application suggests the policy may need adjustment.
  • Empty charts are expected in environments with low elevation activity or strict process elevation rules that prevent most requests from reaching the approval stage.
  • Elevation analytics complement configuration — use these charts to validate that your elevation configuration is behaving as intended, then tune the rules based on what you observe.